|
November 2010 |
WattNodeŽ Energy and Power Meters |
| |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Ken Appel, Manager of Regulated Industries for Veriteq, a Vaisala
company, and author of the white paper explains that he wrote it to address the
commonly overlooked sources of human error inherent in various monitoring
modalities and to provide a systematic way for quality managers to weigh the
pros and cons of different approaches to continuous monitoring. Mr. Appel says, “Whether you choose one
connectivity method over the other or a combination, you will have to decide
what makes the most sense in your organization.
There is no one solution that fits every situation. Always though, a concern is to address the
level of risk you can afford, and to know what these risks are. Understandably, these decisions do not occur
in a vacuum. Physical plant layout, existing IT infrastructure, support
resources and management buy-in to name a few, will likely influence your path.”
To obtain a copy of the white paper write to ken.appel@vaisala.com. For a preview of the white paper, go to (http://www.veriteq.com/cost-ownership-white-paper/index.htm.)
Veriteq is a part
of Vaisala, global leader in environmental and industrial measurement. With
solutions that deliver fail-safe records for temperature, humidity and other
parameters, we provide high performance solutions for validating and monitoring
GMP-regulated and other controlled environments. Vaisala acquired Veriteq in
April, 2010, building on more than 70 years of reliability in measuring
critical environments. Headquartered in Finland, Vaisala is listed on the
NASDAQ OMX Helsinki. www.vaisala.com
[Home Page] [The Automator] [About] [Subscribe ] [Contact Us]